Small Agents, Smaller Blast Radius: Controlling What AI Can Do, (Fri, Oct 16th)
I believe the cybersecurity industry may be approaching AI security the wrong way.
Excerpt from the primary source: SANS Internet Storm Center
Who is affected
Security professionals
What you should do
No specific action is required at this time.
Sources
We link to original and authoritative sources. Headlines and excerpts belong to their publishers.
Related
AI Slop Isn't Just for Social Media; It's Ruining Cyberattacks, Too
Don't buy the hype! AI has been dumbing down cyberattacks, and serious threat actors are barely touching it.
Measuring Human Cryptanalysis Effort
Matthew Green has a new site that tries to estimate the number of cryptanalyst-hours that have been spent analyzing different public-key algorithms: Abstract: We estimate how much public cryptanalysis each public-key assumption has received, using the literature itself as the instrument. From roughly sixteen thousand candidate papers we classify cryptanalytic work on ECDLP, structured and plain lattices, syndrome…
Is AI pentesting as good as a human pentester?
AI pentesting can uncover vulnerabilities missed by human testers, but it also has limitations in consistency, risk assessment, and understanding business context. Intruder compares the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches and explains where AI agents can improve security testing.
Anthropic 'SneakPeek' Flaw Is a Silent Zero-Click Threat
A bug in Claude Code Desktop's preview pane can allow adversaries to quietly steal credentials from developers, including SSH private keys, AWS credentials, and Claude 0Auth tokens.